It seems as though every time a population number is cited for a social media site, the number of users keeps increasing. I'll just go ahead and say it since no one else will. As long as user-to-user incentives exist, there will always be enough fake user accounts to take advantage of what are supposed to be exclusive benefits. What are we talking about here?
500 million user accounts on Twitter (as of April 2012), with 42 million unique visitors per month according to Compete.com (May 2012). It makes you wonder who these users really are. They are more likely to be companies with multiple locations, brand groups or products that appear on the site as multiple "user" accounts. If we just focus on the U.S., it's a mere 107 million users. Let's assume for a moment that the average marketer or social promoter has at least 3 "user" accounts (a personal acct, a main company acct, and a brand account). Take the 107 million accounts and divide that by 3. That's a safe bet that there are only 35 million, at best, Twitter users in the U.S.
Thinking about targeting Facebook users instead? The figure of 901 million users frequently cited by news and marketing publications represents a global figure, with only 155 million (143 million aged 18-65) being in the U.S. There are some ad targeting issues with Facebook which I'll address in another post. Is it plausible that Zynga has over 250 million active users on its popular Facebook games? Possibly, but depends on how an active user is defined. Are we talking unique users accessing a multitude of Zynga games; or counting unique user accounts per game? Here's some hefty division to pare this down to a more realistic number. This is where in-game incentives get silly. Take Cityville's top population number, 40 million, and divide that by 5; a rough estimate of actual number of users or the number of "friends" you need to get by on a daily city/farm/mafia maintenance for your character. If people are willing to write and install browser scripts to autoplay a social media-based game, anything is possible within the Facebook universe. Cityville may only have 8 million real users by conservative estimate. Still, Zynga's $900 million revenues from advertising, in-game branded product placement, and sales of virtual goods and fake currency is pretty damn impressive for casual social gaming.
Data inflation is not such a big deal on business networking site LinkedIn since a business person can really only respond to one unique offer per set of user credentials. Even with its 150 million plus global userbase and more than 40 million users in the US, it's safe to say that you could take that number and divide it by two. It'd be a fair representation of an actual userbase, given company churn and users who forget that they can assign more than one email account to their LinkedIn account. Even without the divide, 40 million business users seems low for the US audience.
Why does any of this matter? Because it's a damn freakin' problem for social media marketers, that's why.
The natural evolution of marketing is like this: a thought, a concept, a plan, execution, implementation, and consultation after the fact. The problem that most companies suffer from is they go from thought to execution without any concept or plan. Then they rely on consultants to tell them what they already know. Outside validation is what's important. If two people agree, that's collaboration. If three people agree, it must be a trend. Or is it?
Showing posts with label traffic analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traffic analysis. Show all posts
Keywords & Tags
Since Blogger / Blogspot are Google domain properties, the work for a blogger is fairly easy when it comes to getting indexed by Google's search bot. One would think that these sites are already optimized for this purpose. The real task is funneling the appropriate audience for the content that is being hosted or written about.
For this example I am using a recipe that I cross-posted to the LiveJournal Foodporn community site and to my own blog where I host the pictures of various cooking experiments. In my initial research into the recipe, I found that while most of the ingredient ratios were the same across Mexican and Latin American cultures, it was known by different names. Hence, the label tags that I used for identifying this recipe were: desserts:fruit, guava, pasteles de guayaba, pastelitos de guayaba y queso, pastry. In the body of the recipe, I have additional keywords: pastelitos de guayaba y queso, guava and cheese strudel.
The top 10 keyword sets (July 24-Aug 25, 2008) users typed into their search engine of choice (Google, Yahoo, AltaVista, or Dogpile) to get to this recipe page:

In terms of SEO, all these keywords were the result of organic searches. Can the keyword phrases be purchased or used for AdSense? Certainly. TheFoodening site is as optimized as it's going to get with respect to Google site indexing. So what's next to boost traffic? More recipes based on keyword phrases that resulted in null content? More cross-posting of recipes to food and recipe sites to piggyback on search traffic? I suppose the real next step would be to select another recipe off my recipe experiment queue, do something creative with it, and post the results.
Related words:
guayaba = guava
queso = cheese
pastelitos = tarts, "pastries"
con = with
de = of/from
y = and
For this example I am using a recipe that I cross-posted to the LiveJournal Foodporn community site and to my own blog where I host the pictures of various cooking experiments. In my initial research into the recipe, I found that while most of the ingredient ratios were the same across Mexican and Latin American cultures, it was known by different names. Hence, the label tags that I used for identifying this recipe were: desserts:fruit, guava, pasteles de guayaba, pastelitos de guayaba y queso, pastry. In the body of the recipe, I have additional keywords: pastelitos de guayaba y queso, guava and cheese strudel.
The top 10 keyword sets (July 24-Aug 25, 2008) users typed into their search engine of choice (Google, Yahoo, AltaVista, or Dogpile) to get to this recipe page:
(click for larger image)
Now, I'd always thought of creating a recipes to match what people were looking for since there would be at least one user out there who might be looking for that recipe again. But, I'm really not sure how chipotlé and guava flavors really mingle together. They might work out quite well.
The marketing take-away: Know your audience. That's really the best way to market products, services, and informational content to prospective consumers and businesses.
Now, I'd always thought of creating a recipes to match what people were looking for since there would be at least one user out there who might be looking for that recipe again. But, I'm really not sure how chipotlé and guava flavors really mingle together. They might work out quite well.
The marketing take-away: Know your audience. That's really the best way to market products, services, and informational content to prospective consumers and businesses.
In terms of SEO, all these keywords were the result of organic searches. Can the keyword phrases be purchased or used for AdSense? Certainly. TheFoodening site is as optimized as it's going to get with respect to Google site indexing. So what's next to boost traffic? More recipes based on keyword phrases that resulted in null content? More cross-posting of recipes to food and recipe sites to piggyback on search traffic? I suppose the real next step would be to select another recipe off my recipe experiment queue, do something creative with it, and post the results.
Related words:
guayaba = guava
queso = cheese
pastelitos = tarts, "pastries"
con = with
de = of/from
y = and
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)