In-flight Advertising

On a recent trip from Seattle to LAX, I noticed two notable avenues to the way passengers are exposed to advertising. The first was listening to a co-branded message between Alaska airlines and VISA credit cards, broadcasted by the pilot. It didn't seem to evoke much interest among the coach passengers. I'd say that it's more like we were too tired to care about another credit card offer. The second was a $20 coupon of a restaurant I'd never heard of which was handed out by a stewardess.

It's not surprising though. The Nov 2005 press release from UK-based Ink Publishing (ink-publishing.com) notes that "global inflight advertising revenues are predicted to grow from US $685 million in 2004 to US $832 million this year and will exceed US $1,010 million in 2006, with increased general advertising spending plus the opening of niche markets by point-to-point airlines taking credit for the growth." These sales figures are based on their own portfolio data of inflight titles they publish. You can imagine how tremendously large this market really is.

What is surprising is how late-to-market some airlines are with capturing their share of this revenue stream.

It is what it is

Yes, I am opinionated, especially about marketing and a lot of what goes on in this blog seems to look down upon many practices within the industry. I call it how I see it, with both an agency-side and client-side perspective. I recommend any marketing student fresh out of college to get experience from both sides of the fence. It really helps with perception and anticipation of client needs. If you ever come across a marketer without an opinion, turn around and walk away quickly.

Here're my new year's wishes..

I wish that people would be more honest and open about how they interact with other people, both on a social and business level.

I wish that corporate nirvana wasn't so boring. I recently left a job where I was in total control of the direction and scope of market strategy for the company. I reported to the CEO, and occassionaly to the Sr VP of Sales and Marketing for sales related issues. I had one direct report. I created and managed marketing campaigns. I developed and launched two new marketing services. I revamped the sales lead generation system to be entirely paperless. I negotiated vendor prices for data acquisition projects. I did legal compliance for telemarketing data and email marketing, eventhough we had inhouse corporate counsel. I built a website to generate ad revenue for the companies partnered and doing business with ours. I did a lot of things. But, I got bored and frustrated that I couldn't do more. How could I do more? Well, for one I would have liked a set, quantifiable, spendable budget instead of having to pick and choose between projects that I thought would be good to enhance the brand image of the company instead of ones that would gain the CEO instant gratification on short-term benefits.

Yes. I have issues. Everyone has issues. I thrive on making the world better, making marketing a legitimate science, making health defying desserts, and ranting on about what can be done to make this a better place.

My holy grail of marketing is to learn and know everything there is to know about marketing in each of the four marketing segments (business, consumer, non-profit, and government) and become more aware of industry trends affected by marketing. The ultimate test of a marketer is not the job itself, but what you do with that knowledge. Anybody can work for a living. That's no sweat. Validation comes from the outside.. from writing journal articles that aren't meant as sales pitches for your own company, from teaching college courses, from revitalizing the way people think about marketing. The best thing of all is that learning is a continuous process and marketing is always evolving.

Pay for Pixels

Have you been approached by an SEO expert pitching this: Hello, we have a great offer today for exclusive ad positioning with our partner sites. You get to pay for dots!

Fortunately, I have not.

I read an absurd article in DM News about pixel advertising; then I did a search on it and found PPC sites selling pixel ad space from $0.05 to $1.00 per pixel. How dumb do advertisers think people are? For those of you unfamiliar with computers or pixels for that matter, pixels are the smallest unit in a graphical image, typically a single dot by most definitions.

Let's say that the average webpage has the dimensions to fit a 1024 x 768 screen, without requiring its users to use the arrow keys to scroll off the page to view more content. Theoretically you can make your webpages as long as you want, provided that you paid for enough bandwidth for that information to be sent from your web server to a user's screen. Unfortunately, the more traffic your site receives, the more you'll have to pay for bandwidth usage unless you host your own web server.

A problem with this new fad is that many of these new pixel ad websites have a graph paper display of squares with the bought pixels displayed as text advertising. Bloody useless. No content. Why bother putting up ad space if there is no content? It's another outcropping of link farming, only worse, people are paying for it. You might as well put up a sign in the desert saying "Eat Here" when there're no restaurants around for hundreds of miles.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...